Assessing impact submissions for REF2014: An evaluation
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Research Excellence Framework (REF) is a new system for assessing the quality of research in UK higher education institutions (HEIs). For the first time, part of the assessment included the wider impact of research. RAND Europe was commissioned to evaluate the assessment process of the impact element of REF submissions, and to explore the strengths and weaknesses of the assessment process in delivering reliable, robust and fair outcomes, identify any unforeseen issues emerging during the assessment process and outline broad implications for the assessment process of impact in future REF exercises. This report provides a summary of our key findings, complemented by a detailed analysis of the process using the following methodologies: focus groups with panel members, users and impact assessors; interviews with panellists; and a survey of all panellists. This evaluation complements another piece of research that RAND Europe undertook for the UK higher education funding councils to evaluate the submission process HEIs underwent to prepare for the impact element of REF 2014 (Manville et al. 2015a, Manville et al. 2015b).
منابع مشابه
Using prediction markets to forecast research evaluations
The 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF2014) was conducted to assess the quality of research carried out at higher education institutions in the UK over a 6 year period. However, the process was criticized for being expensive and bureaucratic, and it was argued that similar information could be obtained more simply from various existing metrics. We were interested in whether a prediction ma...
متن کاملResearch impact in the community-based health sciences: an analysis of 162 case studies from the 2014 UK Research Excellence Framework
BACKGROUND The 2014 UK Research Excellence Framework (REF2014) generated a unique database of impact case studies, each describing a body of research and impact beyond academia. We sought to explore the nature and mechanism of impact in a sample of these. METHODS The study design was manual content analysis of a large sample of impact case studies (producing mainly quantitative data), plus in...
متن کاملQualitative versus Quantitative Evaluation of Scientists' Impact: A Medical Toxicology Tale
Evaluation of scientists working in a specific area of science is necessary, as they may strive for same limited resources, grants and academic promotions. One of the most common and accepted methods of assessing the performance and impact of a scientist is calculating the number of citations for their publications. However, such method suffer from certain shortcomings. It has become more and m...
متن کاملAssessing the Health Impact of Trade: A Call for an Expanded Research Agenda; Comment on “The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?”
Labonté et al provide an insightful analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and its impact on a selection of important health determinants. Their work confirms concerns raised by previous analyses of leaked drafts and offers governments serious and timely reasons to carefully consider provisions of the agreement prior to moving forward with ratification. It also contributes more general...
متن کاملAssessing the impact of knowledge management strategies on employee innovative behavior in the work place(case study:knowledge-based organizations)
The goal of this research is the evaluation of knowledge management strategies which impact to innovative behavior personnel in workplace. Statistical community includes all human source bosses and assistants in Mazandaran public universities which their numbers were 105 totally. The number of statistical sample was evaluated 82 individuals by using Cochrane equation. To gather data, a question...
متن کامل